Nowhere to hide [Oct 15th, 2011]
Oct 23rd 2011 10:00-12:00 Ichigaya Renoir My
space
Ono, Ogawa, Tomozawa, Saito, Kurasawa,
Sotani, Miyabe and Yamazaki
Articles we discussed
[Leaders][Solar Power] Thou orb aloft
full-dazzling
[Asia] Branding Japan as “cool” No limits,
no laws
[International][Tax havens] Trouble Island
[Finance and Economics][Economic Focus]
Realism rewarded
[Science and technology] Transporter of
delight
We
reserved a meeting room at Renoir for the first time. Members of the group increases so we are anxious about securing seats and comfortable environment for discussion.
Renoir have meeting rooms around Tokyo so last week Ono, Ogawa and Yamagata decided to use a
meeting room in Ichigaya for the study group. We had new comers this week. Miyabe, who is a
friend of Tomozawa, working in a consulting firm and Yamazaki, who is a
colleague of Ogawa came to join.
We started from a solar power article
Saito chose to discuss. The article insists two things. One is that solar power
is now taking off and the other is that solar subsidies are wasteful. Tomozawa specialized
in solar power inhis graduate school and Sotani is now struggling with
renewable energy on her job so they leaded the discussion with various new
ideas and information.
Second
article we picked up was about “Cool Japan”. They introduce a striking picture
of girls who are walking on Takeshita Street wearing strange colorful fashion, attached
with words ”where Toyota failed...” I think this article is ironical because
even though the headline “beautiful people join hands with bureaucrats” has a
positive meaning, they don’t think the girls looks beautiful. The article
introduce Japan’s“The Cool Japan Promotion Strategy
Programme” promoted by METI. The whole context is favorable but as the title
“No limits, no laws” suggests, they are doubtful of the strategy of bureaucrats
who usually make regulations and rules.
Let’s follow
remaining articles. Ogawa chose the third article about tax haven. “Haven” is
different from “heaven”. But both meanings can be understood when we consider
tax haven so we often take haven to heaven by mistake. Firstly we got ideas of the
havens in shape. Then we made a brief debate about whether we should accept
existence of tax havens or not. What would you say if you are “No” to tax
havens? Debate was experimental but it was fan.
Ono picked up a
column about two Novel Prize winners latest studies. He made a lecture of the
winning and answered our question why they got prizes. He used a white board
for the lecture. It was also new for us.
During
his lecture the time was up because we had two hours reservation of the room
but we still had one article from science and technology section. Kurasawa
picked up “Transporter of delights”, which is about the genetics of happiness.
She chose the article because we had discussed Brazilian optimistic attitude
based on the article of Brazil economy. We moved to have a lunch and during the
lunch we continued to discuss the topic. Most of us have curiosities and eager
to learn new things.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿