America and Islamic State
Mission relaunched
Article:
Barak Obama has been trying to avoid getting into a fight in Syria for
more than 3 years but he at last faced up to the inevitable fights with the
jihadists. His attempt to deal with them is a test of America’s commitment to
global security.
America seems to be locked in relative decline in recent years and
overwhelmed by the forces of disorder. IS embodies this frightening trend. It
is a non-state body and thrives on chaos. Its rise has also reflects American
policy (Mr. Bush’s invasion of Iraq and Mr. Obama’s studious inaction in Syria).
Standing back has not worked well elsewhere in the world. When America
stepped back, its allies also stepped back, too. IS has induced a change of
heart among the American people by threatening them. Mr. Obama has a chance not
just strike a blow for order in the Middle East, but also to give diclinists
pause.
Mr. Obama should take a lesson from the mismanagement in post-invasion Iraq.
He needs coalitions and partnerships from Sunnis, the UN, Britain, Turkey and
so on. Although the mission to stop IS will be long and hard, it is true that
no other nation could even contemplate.
Discussion:
1.
The economist clearly suggests the America interfere
in the situation in the Middle East. But, some people think it should not. What
kind opinion do you have on this issue?
2.
One of the reason why IS hates the America and the
Western society is a wide gap between Western society and the other places
including their places. Why do you think this kind of gap leads hatred? How
should we act to ease the situation?
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿